Read Immigration Judges and U.S. Asylum Policy (Pennsylvania Studies in Human Rights) by Banks Miller, Linda Camp Keith, Jennifer S. Holmes Online
Download # Immigration Judges and U.S. Asylum Policy (Pennsylvania Studies in Human Rights) PDF by ! Banks Miller, Linda Camp Keith, Jennifer S. Holmes eBook or Kindle ePUB Online free. Immigration Judges and U.S. Asylum Policy (Pennsylvania Studies in Human Rights) arrington said One Star. Statically boring]
| Title | : | Immigration Judges and U.S. Asylum Policy (Pennsylvania Studies in Human Rights) |
| Author | : | |
| Rating | : | 4.31 (662 Votes) |
| Asin | : | 0812246608 |
| Format Type | : | paperback |
| Number of Pages | : | 248 Pages |
| Publish Date | : | 2013-07-26 |
| Language | : | English |
Jennifer S. Holmes is Professor of Public Policy and Political Economy at the School of Economic, Political, and Policy Sciences at the University of Texas at Dallas. Banks Miller teaches political science at the School of Economic, Political, and Policy Sciences at the University of Texas at Dallas. Linda Camp Keith is Associate Professor of Political Science at the School of Economic, Political, and Policy Sciences at the Unive
arrington said One Star. Statically boring
Furthermore, the authors examine how local economic and political conditions as well as congressional reforms have affected outcomes in asylum cases, concluding with a series of policy recommendations aimed at improving the quality of immigration law decision making rather than trying to reduce disparities between decision makers.. These disparities also raise important policy considerations about how to fix what many perceive to be a broken adjudication system.With theoretical sophistication and empirical rigor, Immigration Judges and U.S. Asylum Policy investigates more than 500,000 asylum cases that were decided by U.S. The authors find that judges treat certain facts about an asylum applicant more objectively than others: facts determined to be legally relevant tend to be treated similarly by judges of different political ideologies, while facts considered extralegal are treated subjectiv
Because of its impressive use of an innovative cognitive framework for analysis of judges' decisions, the book also makes a valuable contribution to the study of judicial behavior."—Lawrence Baum, Ohio State University. Through a series of careful analyses based on an extraordinary body of data, the authors provide a rich picture of the considerations that shape decisions by immigration judges in asylum cases. Their insightful interpretations of their findings do much to inform the discussion of proposals to change the system of adjudicating applications for asylum. The authors skillfully blend theories of human rights in international relations, immigration control, and judici
Download Immigration Judges and U.S. Asylum Policy (Pennsylvania Studies in Human Rights)
Download as PDF : Click Here
Download as DOC : Click Here
Download as RTF : Click Here