Read Split Decisions: How and Why to Take a Break from Feminism by Janet Halley Online
Read ^ Split Decisions: How and Why to Take a Break from Feminism PDF by ! Janet Halley eBook or Kindle ePUB Online free. Split Decisions: How and Why to Take a Break from Feminism She argues that sexuality involves deeply contested and clashing realities and interests, and that feminism helps us understand only some of them. All these incommensurate theories, she argues, enrich thinking on the left not despite their break from each other but because of it. Feminists are, in many areas of social and political life, partners in governance. Halley also invites feminism to abandon its uncritical relationship to its own power. Halley offers a genealogy of various feminisms and
| Title | : | Split Decisions: How and Why to Take a Break from Feminism |
| Author | : | |
| Rating | : | 4.25 (847 Votes) |
| Asin | : | 0691136327 |
| Format Type | : | paperback |
| Number of Pages | : | 424 Pages |
| Publish Date | : | 2016-09-15 |
| Language | : | English |
She argues that sexuality involves deeply contested and clashing realities and interests, and that feminism helps us understand only some of them. All these incommensurate theories, she argues, enrich thinking on the left not despite their break from each other but because of it. Feminists are, in many areas of social and political life, partners in governance. Halley also invites feminism to abandon its uncritical relationship to its own power. Halley offers a genealogy of various feminisms and of gay, queer, and trans theories as they split from each other in the United States during the 1980s and 1990s. To see crucial dimensions of sexuality that feminism does not reveal--the interests of gays and lesbians to be sure, but also those of men, and of constituencies and values beyond the realm of sex and gender--we might need to take a
. She is the author of "Don't: A Reader's Guide to Military Anti-Gay Policy" and, with Wendy Brown, coeditor of "Left Legalism/Left Critique". Janet Halley is Royall Professor of Law at Harvard Law School, where she teaches family law, comparative family law, discrimination law, the legal regulation of sexuality, and legal theory
"A groundbreaking book examining the contradictions and limitations of feminism in the law. A potentially polarizing call to take a break from feminism could not be more elegantly presented."--Prabha Kotiswaran, Feminist Legal Studies. Halley is critical of feminists for relying primarily upon a 'prohibitionist' approach that identifies what's bad in the world and then writes a statute making it unlawful."--Michelle Bates Deakin, Harvard Law Bulletin"Janet Halley's readings of texts are an example of a form of theorizing that can take a break from feminism without dismissing feminist theory from the discussion. Halley's first person, conversational style is bold, witty, candid, incisive and accessible. As a polemic the
A Conversation about Theoretical Feminism K. N. Janet Halley's *Split Decisions* is an impressive piece of critical inquiry. In it she outlines a genealogy of theoretical feminism from Catherine MacKinnon's work in the early 1980s through queer and trans theory in the late 1990s. Providing close readings of representative texts from this especially dynamic/fraught era in feminist thought (which coincides with the institutionalization of Women's Studies on college campuses), Halley offers the most complete picture to date of the major figures and theoretical debates in academic feminism.Halley's firs. Mentos said Solid argument for multiple approaches. This book is not actually a critique of feminism so much as a critique of feminism's ubiquity as a framework within which to think about gender and sex/sexuality. It has much more to do with stepping outside of the structuralism and moralism of feminism, to get a different perspective. It's also a great model for students, who will benefit from seeing a top scholar do close readings of important texts. I appreciate that while Halley is trading in big and often complex ideas, she writes to reveal and is very readable. I got a lot out of it.. Chris said Excellent critique of the reifying effects of feminist theory. Excellent critique of the reifying effects of feminist theory. Some strange legal interpretations allowing for different perspectives, though a bit short on pragmatic possibilities. A few sharp lines, such as "Feminists walk the halls of power," seem poorly conceived and unsubstantiated by evidence.Mostly a great read with truly thought provoking ideas in this landmark work that moves from feminist theory to queer theory.
Download Split Decisions: How and Why to Take a Break from Feminism
Download as PDF : Click Here
Download as DOC : Click Here
Download as RTF : Click Here